FW Conch
03-05-2022, 10:54 PM
One more thing that the data shows is that the change of 25 fps per inch of barrel length is only rough estimate around a specific barrel length.
It is right on for a .223 bullet at 28 inches but off by 6.5 fps at 24 inches. for this bullet and powder load.
I suspect that estimated change may not be consistent for all bullet types in the same caliber since friction will be different depending upon the amount of bullet body touching the rifling.
I'm not even sure that factor would be accurate for all calibers.
There are probably a couple of other factors that might also complicate the estimated change per inch as well.
CF, Your research, experimentation, and attention to detail are enlightening. I go back to Your posts often for a refresher. Wish I could shoot as much as You do.
Thank You
It is right on for a .223 bullet at 28 inches but off by 6.5 fps at 24 inches. for this bullet and powder load.
I suspect that estimated change may not be consistent for all bullet types in the same caliber since friction will be different depending upon the amount of bullet body touching the rifling.
I'm not even sure that factor would be accurate for all calibers.
There are probably a couple of other factors that might also complicate the estimated change per inch as well.
CF, Your research, experimentation, and attention to detail are enlightening. I go back to Your posts often for a refresher. Wish I could shoot as much as You do.
Thank You